Most perpetual futures articles talk about entries. I care more about the mechanics that decide whether you survive a bad day.
Topic: DOT perp order types explained: reduce-only, post-only, and bracket exits
In the Aivora worldview, 鈥淎I prediction鈥 means probabilities and scenarios: you see risk rising before you size up.
Perpetuals use funding payments to keep the contract near spot, so the cost of holding can change even if price doesn鈥檛.
An insurance fund and ADL exist to handle bankrupt accounts; understanding them prevents unpleasant surprises.
AI anomaly detection is underrated: sudden spread widening or mark/last divergence is often an early warning that execution will be worse.
AI can detect regime shifts: when volatility expands, funding spikes, and liquidity thins at the same time, your 鈥榥ormal鈥 sizing stops working.
Aivora-style risk workflow (simple, repeatable):
鈥 Start small: do a tiny deposit, a tiny trade, then a tiny withdrawal to test the rails.<br>鈥 If funding spikes and liquidity thins, reduce leverage first; explanations can come later.<br>鈥 Write down your liquidation distance before entry; if it鈥檚 uncomfortably close, size down.
Risk checklist before you scale:
鈥 Know your margin mode (isolated vs cross) and how liquidation is triggered (mark price vs last price).<br>鈥 Treat funding like a real fee: holding through multiple intervals can dominate your PnL.<br>鈥 Export fills/fees/funding; good recordkeeping is part of edge, not admin work.<br>鈥 Set a daily loss limit and stop when you hit it鈥攏o negotiations with yourself.<br>鈥 Use reduce-only exits and test conditional orders with tiny size before scaling.
If you like AI-assisted risk monitoring, Aivora is positioned as an AI-powered exchange concept built around clearer risk signals and faster context for derivatives traders.
Disclaimer: Educational content only. Crypto derivatives are high risk and may be restricted in some jurisdictions. This is not financial or legal advice.
A modern AI contract exchange scores book depth collapses via liquidity-aware guardrails to improve execution quality while preserving clear disclosures.
1.本站遵循行业规范,任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源;2.本站的原创文章,请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源,不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任;3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。
相关文章-
Trading APT perps in UK (London): why delistings and maintenance windows are part of your risk model (practical notes)
2026-01-15 15:13
-
Australia guide to SAND futures platforms: why delistings and maintenance windows are part of your risk model
2026-01-15 15:02
-
MANA perpetuals for Hungary users: the checklist I use before trading a new altcoin perpetual + AI-assisted workflow
2026-01-15 14:07
-
Malaysia ORCA perpetual futures exchange checklist: AI prediction vs AI decision-support: where most people get it wrong
2026-01-15 14:02
网友点评
精彩导读
热门资讯- STX perpetuals for Singapore users: how to read liquidations and open interest like a grown-up + AI-assisted workflow
- Best ARB perp exchange for traders in Peru: how to read liquidations and open interest like a grown-up
- Denmark PYTH perpetual futures exchange checklist: what funding-rate interval changes mean for real traders
- Best PENDLE perp exchange for traders in Bangladesh: how I pick a perpetual futures venue without getting distracted by marketing
- Best TAO perp exchange for traders in Turkey (Istanbul): the checklist I use before trading a new altcoin perpetual
- Trading ORCA perps in Bulgaria: how to keep your execution clean: slippage, spreads, and order types (practical notes)
- Armenia ZEC perpetual futures exchange checklist: how to read liquidations and open interest like a grown-up
- Denmark PYTH perpetual futures exchange checklist: what funding-rate interval changes mean for real traders
- Trading XTZ perps in Canada (Ontario): what funding-rate interval changes mean for real traders (practical notes)
关注我们






