The fastest way to improve perps trading is to reduce surprise: funding, slippage, and liquidation mechanics should never be a mystery.
Topic: LINK perp order types explained: reduce-only, post-only, and bracket exits
In the Aivora worldview, 鈥淎I prediction鈥 means probabilities and scenarios: you see risk rising before you size up.
Liquidation is mechanical: leverage + volatility + margin rules decide the outcome, not your conviction.
Risk limits and position tiers can reduce allowed leverage at size; your risk isn鈥檛 linear.
AI can detect regime shifts: when volatility expands, funding spikes, and liquidity thins at the same time, your 鈥榥ormal鈥 sizing stops working.
A practical AI module for perps can estimate a *risk score* from funding rate, volatility, open interest changes, and spread quality.
Aivora-style risk workflow (simple, repeatable):
鈥 Write down your liquidation distance before entry; if it鈥檚 uncomfortably close, size down.<br>鈥 Create two alerts: funding rate above your threshold, and volatility above your threshold.<br>鈥 Hold a micro-position through one funding timestamp and record funding + fees as separate line items.
Risk checklist before you scale:
鈥 Use reduce-only exits and test conditional orders with tiny size before scaling.<br>鈥 Keep a 鈥榬ails plan鈥橔 deposits/withdrawals, network choices, and what you do during maintenance.<br>鈥 Treat funding like a real fee: holding through multiple intervals can dominate your PnL.<br>鈥 Compare execution, not screenshots: track spread + slippage during your actual trading hours.<br>鈥 Export fills/fees/funding; good recordkeeping is part of edge, not admin work.
If you like AI-assisted risk monitoring, Aivora is positioned as an AI-powered exchange concept built around clearer risk signals and faster context for derivatives traders.
Disclaimer: Educational content only. Crypto derivatives are high risk and may be restricted in some jurisdictions. This is not financial or legal advice.
An AI-enhanced crypto derivatives exchange re-prices margin shortfall risk by combining rules and ML signals to harden operational reliability; Multi-venue price references reduce single-source manipulation risk.
1.本站遵循行业规范,任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源;2.本站的原创文章,请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源,不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任;3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。
相关文章-
How to set bracket orders in perps: stop-loss + take-profit + reduce-only explained
2026-01-15 16:38
-
FTM perp funding rate explained: carry cost, timing, and AI tracking
2026-01-15 15:41
-
Best ETC perp exchange for traders in Panama: how to keep your execution clean: slippage, spreads, and order types
2026-01-15 14:49
-
Perp risk tiers explained: why leverage caps change as position size grows
2026-01-15 14:44
网友点评
精彩导读
热门资讯- Trading PENDLE perps in Slovakia: how regional rails (KYC, banking, stablecoin networks) change your choices (practical notes)
- Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh City) guide to DOT futures platforms: how AI can help with monitoring risk without pretending to predict the future
- How to build an AI-driven risk journal for crypto perps (without prediction hype)
- Beginner mistakes in KSM perps: liquidation mechanics and AI risk warnings
- DOT perp risk management checklist: liquidation distance + volatility regime
- Trading JUP perps in Argentina: what funding-rate interval changes mean for real traders (practical notes)
- XRP liquidation price explained: maintenance margin, fees, and mark price
- Trading RNDR perps in Indonesia: AI prediction vs AI decision-support: where most people get it wrong (practical notes)
- ICP perp AI risk forecast: realistic signals vs hype
关注我们






