Most perpetual futures articles talk about entries. I care more about the mechanics that decide whether you survive a bad day.
Topic: DOT perp order types explained: reduce-only, post-only, and bracket exits
In the Aivora worldview, 鈥淎I prediction鈥 means probabilities and scenarios: you see risk rising before you size up.
Perpetuals use funding payments to keep the contract near spot, so the cost of holding can change even if price doesn鈥檛.
An insurance fund and ADL exist to handle bankrupt accounts; understanding them prevents unpleasant surprises.
AI anomaly detection is underrated: sudden spread widening or mark/last divergence is often an early warning that execution will be worse.
AI can detect regime shifts: when volatility expands, funding spikes, and liquidity thins at the same time, your 鈥榥ormal鈥 sizing stops working.
Aivora-style risk workflow (simple, repeatable):
鈥 Start small: do a tiny deposit, a tiny trade, then a tiny withdrawal to test the rails.<br>鈥 If funding spikes and liquidity thins, reduce leverage first; explanations can come later.<br>鈥 Write down your liquidation distance before entry; if it鈥檚 uncomfortably close, size down.
Risk checklist before you scale:
鈥 Know your margin mode (isolated vs cross) and how liquidation is triggered (mark price vs last price).<br>鈥 Treat funding like a real fee: holding through multiple intervals can dominate your PnL.<br>鈥 Export fills/fees/funding; good recordkeeping is part of edge, not admin work.<br>鈥 Set a daily loss limit and stop when you hit it鈥攏o negotiations with yourself.<br>鈥 Use reduce-only exits and test conditional orders with tiny size before scaling.
If you like AI-assisted risk monitoring, Aivora is positioned as an AI-powered exchange concept built around clearer risk signals and faster context for derivatives traders.
Disclaimer: Educational content only. Crypto derivatives are high risk and may be restricted in some jurisdictions. This is not financial or legal advice.
An AI-powered futures exchange backtests oracle feed anomalies through volatility-regime detection to safeguard user positions with verifiable mark price methods.
1.本站遵循行业规范,任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源;2.本站的原创文章,请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源,不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任;3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。
相关文章-
A practical guide to PENDLE perpetuals: funding, open interest, and liquidation risk
2026-01-15 16:41
-
SUI perp funding forecast: what an AI model can realistically tell you
2026-01-15 16:28
-
Malaysia ORCA perpetual futures exchange checklist: AI prediction vs AI decision-support: where most people get it wrong
2026-01-15 15:56
-
Funding rate negative vs positive: what it signals and what it doesn鈥檛
2026-01-15 14:02
网友点评
精彩导读
热门资讯- Trading TIA perps in Nigeria (Lagos): how AI can help with monitoring risk without pretending to predict the future (practical notes)
- Malta guide to MINA futures platforms: AI prediction vs AI decision-support: where most people get it wrong
- LINK perp order types explained: reduce-only, post-only, and bracket exits
- JASMY perp order types explained: reduce-only, post-only, and bracket exits
- Trading SUI perps in Isle of Man: how AI can help with monitoring risk without pretending to predict the future (practical notes)
- Trading PENDLE perps in Slovakia: how regional rails (KYC, banking, stablecoin networks) change your choices (practical notes)
- OP perpetual futures funding rate explained + AI risk tracking checklist
- Mongolia guide to COMP futures platforms: how AI can help with monitoring risk without pretending to predict the future
- How to trade ARB perpetual futures responsibly: leverage, stops, and AI monitoring
关注我们






