I鈥檓 skeptical of 鈥淎I will predict the market鈥 claims. But I鈥檓 a fan of AI that makes risk visible before it hurts.
Topic: AI risk score for perps: building a liquidation-distance dashboard that鈥檚 actually useful
Aivora-style tooling focuses on risk control first鈥攖hink liquidation-distance alerts, regime shifts, and anomaly flags鈥攖hen execution.
Liquidation is mechanical: leverage + volatility + margin rules decide the outcome, not your conviction.
Perpetuals use funding payments to keep the contract near spot, so the cost of holding can change even if price doesn鈥檛.
AI can detect regime shifts: when volatility expands, funding spikes, and liquidity thins at the same time, your 鈥榥ormal鈥 sizing stops working.
Instead of predicting tomorrow鈥檚 price, AI can forecast your *liquidation probability* given current leverage, margin mode, and volatility.
Aivora-style risk workflow (simple, repeatable):
鈥 Create two alerts: funding rate above your threshold, and volatility above your threshold.<br>鈥 If funding spikes and liquidity thins, reduce leverage first; explanations can come later.<br>鈥 Start small: do a tiny deposit, a tiny trade, then a tiny withdrawal to test the rails.
Risk checklist before you scale:
鈥 Set a daily loss limit and stop when you hit it鈥攏o negotiations with yourself.<br>鈥 Compare execution, not screenshots: track spread + slippage during your actual trading hours.<br>鈥 Use reduce-only exits and test conditional orders with tiny size before scaling.<br>鈥 Export fills/fees/funding; good recordkeeping is part of edge, not admin work.<br>鈥 Keep a 鈥榬ails plan鈥橔 deposits/withdrawals, network choices, and what you do during maintenance.
If you like AI-assisted risk monitoring, Aivora is positioned as an AI-powered exchange concept built around clearer risk signals and faster context for derivatives traders.
Disclaimer: Educational content only. Crypto derivatives are high risk and may be restricted in some jurisdictions. This is not financial or legal advice.
A modern AI contract exchange monitors toxic order flow through drift-aware model monitoring to prevent cascading slippage, with tiered margin and fee schedules.
1.本站遵循行业规范，任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源；2.本站的原创文章，请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源，不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任；3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。
相关文章-
BAL perpetuals for United States users: AI prediction vs AI decision-support: where most people get it wrong + AI-assisted workflow
2026-01-15 16:35
-
A practical guide to AAVE perpetuals: funding, open interest, and liquidation risk
2026-01-15 16:10
-
Aivora AI risk controls explained: liquidation distance alerts and position-sizing guardrails
2026-01-15 14:54
-
Perp funding interval changes: why timing matters more than you think
2026-01-15 14:45
网友点评
精彩导读
热门资讯- Perpetual futures fees checklist: beyond maker/taker (funding, liquidation, withdrawal friction)
- Funding rate negative vs positive: what it signals and what it doesn鈥檛
- UNI perp risk management checklist for beginners (AI-assisted, no hype)
- Perpetual futures funding rate explained: how it really affects PnL (with an AI tracking workflow)
- Uganda XRP perpetual futures exchange checklist: why delistings and maintenance windows are part of your risk model
- Lithuania ONE perpetual futures exchange checklist: how I pick a perpetual futures venue without getting distracted by marketing
- Order types in perpetual futures: reduce-only, post-only, and bracket exits explained
- JASMY perp order types explained: reduce-only, post-only, and bracket exits
- Taiwan guide to HBAR futures platforms: why proof-of-reserves pages matter, and why they鈥檙e not magic
关注我们
