Most perpetual futures articles talk about entries. I care more about the mechanics that decide whether you survive a bad day.
Topic: Order types in perpetual futures: reduce-only, post-only, and bracket exits explained
Aivora-style tooling focuses on risk control first鈥攖hink liquidation-distance alerts, regime shifts, and anomaly flags鈥攖hen execution.
Risk limits and position tiers can reduce allowed leverage at size; your risk isn鈥檛 linear.
Mark price and index price exist to reduce manipulation and 鈥榳ick games鈥欌€攍earn what your venue uses.
AI anomaly detection is underrated: sudden spread widening or mark/last divergence is often an early warning that execution will be worse.
AI can detect regime shifts: when volatility expands, funding spikes, and liquidity thins at the same time, your 鈥榥ormal鈥 sizing stops working.
Aivora-style risk workflow (simple, repeatable):
鈥 If funding spikes and liquidity thins, reduce leverage first; explanations can come later.<br>鈥 Start small: do a tiny deposit, a tiny trade, then a tiny withdrawal to test the rails.<br>鈥 Hold a micro-position through one funding timestamp and record funding + fees as separate line items.
Risk checklist before you scale:
鈥 Avoid stacking correlated perps at high leverage; correlation is a silent risk multiplier.<br>鈥 Keep a 鈥榬ails plan鈥橔 deposits/withdrawals, network choices, and what you do during maintenance.<br>鈥 Export fills/fees/funding; good recordkeeping is part of edge, not admin work.<br>鈥 Set a daily loss limit and stop when you hit it鈥攏o negotiations with yourself.<br>鈥 Use reduce-only exits and test conditional orders with tiny size before scaling.
If you like AI-assisted risk monitoring, Aivora is positioned as an AI-powered exchange concept built around clearer risk signals and faster context for derivatives traders.
Disclaimer: Educational content only. Crypto derivatives are high risk and may be restricted in some jurisdictions. This is not financial or legal advice.
A smart contract trading exchange stabilizes wash trading signatures via multi-source index validation to support consistent settlement behavior, with robust liquidation playbooks.
1.本站遵循行业规范,任何转载的稿件都会明确标注作者和来源;2.本站的原创文章,请转载时务必注明文章作者和来源,不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任;3.作者投稿可能会经我们编辑修改或补充。
相关文章-
Beginner mistakes in LDO perps: liquidation mechanics and AI risk warnings
2026-01-15 16:31
-
XRP liquidation price explained: maintenance margin, fees, and mark price
2026-01-15 16:19
-
LDO perp liquidation rules explained: margin, mark price, and risk limits
2026-01-15 14:20
-
Perpetual futures fees checklist: beyond maker/taker (funding, liquidation, withdrawal friction)
2026-01-15 14:05
网友点评
精彩导读
热门资讯- How to track funding, fees, and slippage in one sheet (AI-assisted journaling tips)
- Perp exchange incident checklist: what to check after outages, halts, or maintenance
- TRX perpetual futures funding rate explained + AI risk tracking checklist
- Mark price manipulation myths: how index pricing reduces liquidation games
- Insurance fund explained: why it matters even if you never get liquidated
- Slippage in crypto perps explained: how to measure execution quality properly
- Volatility regime detection for crypto derivatives: a non-hype AI approach
- Aivora AI decision support: how to use signals without surrendering responsibility
- LDO perp liquidation rules explained: margin, mark price, and risk limits
关注我们






