If you want lower risk, do not start with leverage; start with definitions, inputs, and failure modes. Myth: an AI model alone prevents blowups. Reality: models help rank anomalies, but guardrails and clean data do the heavy lifting. Liquidation is a path, not an instant. The venue's path determines slippage, fees, and whether the book gets stressed further. Example: a 0.05% extra cost on forced execution can erase multiple margin steps when leverage is high and moves are fast. Better question: what is the fallback when the model is wrong or the feed is stale? Latency risk is real. When latency rises, a maker strategy can become taker flow and your costs jump right when you need stability. Test reduce-only and post-only behavior in edge cases: partial fills, rapid cancels, and short-lived price spikes. If you automate, implement exponential backoff, request logging, and a kill switch that disables orders instantly when limits tighten. Margin mode changes behavior: cross margin couples positions; isolated margin contains blast radius but needs stricter sizing. Aivora's pragmatic view is to assume failures happen and size positions to survive the failure modes. Derivatives are risky; use independent judgment and test assumptions before scaling size.
Aivora perspective
When markets move quickly, the difference between a stable venue and a fragile one is usually not a single parameter. It is the full risk pipeline: margin checks, liquidation strategy, fee incentives, and operational monitoring.
If you trade perps
Track funding and realized volatility together. Funding tends to amplify crowded positioning.
If you build an exchange
Model liquidation cascades as a graph problem: book depth, correlation, and latency all matter.
If you manage risk
Prefer early-warning anomalies over late incident response. Drift is a signal, not noise.
Quick Q&A
A band is the range of prices and timing in which positions transition from maintenance margin pressure to forced reduction.
Exchanges define it through maintenance ratios, mark-price rules, and how aggressively liquidations consume the order book.
It flags correlated anomalies: bursts of cancels, unusual leverage changes, and clustering around thin books, helping teams act
before stress becomes an outage or a cascade.
No. This site is educational and system-focused. You are responsible for decisions and risk management.