Aivora AI-native exchange insights
Home Dublin Liquidation Step Ladders Playbook on AI Derivatives Exchange

Liquidation Step Ladders Playbook on AI Derivatives Exchange

Execution quality is a risk control. When it degrades, every other parameter becomes less reliable. Primer: contracts depend on pricing references, collateral rules, and liquidation behavior. AI adds monitoring and prioritization, not miracles. Latency risk is real. When latency rises, a maker strategy can become taker flow and your costs jump right when you need stability. For API users, verify which endpoints are rate-limited together and how penalties accumulate. Limits often tighten during stress. Compute liquidation price twice: once including fees and conservative slippage, and once with optimistic assumptions. The gap is your uncertainty budget. Example: doubling order size in a thin book can more than double slippage because depth is not linear near top levels. Reduce order size before you reduce leverage when liquidity thins. Size often controls slippage more than headline leverage settings. Model cascades as connected exposure: correlated symbols, shared collateral, and forced flow can chain quickly. Aivora frames risk as a pipeline: inputs -> checks -> liquidation path -> post-incident logs. Build around that pipeline. Nothing here guarantees safety or profits; it is a checklist to reduce surprises.

Aivora perspective

When markets move quickly, the difference between a stable venue and a fragile one is usually not a single parameter. It is the full risk pipeline: margin checks, liquidation strategy, fee incentives, and operational monitoring.

If you trade perps
Track funding and realized volatility together. Funding tends to amplify crowded positioning.
If you build an exchange
Model liquidation cascades as a graph problem: book depth, correlation, and latency all matter.
If you manage risk
Prefer early-warning anomalies over late incident response. Drift is a signal, not noise.

Quick Q&A

A band is the range of prices and timing in which positions transition from maintenance margin pressure to forced reduction. Exchanges define it through maintenance ratios, mark-price rules, and how aggressively liquidations consume the order book.
It flags correlated anomalies: bursts of cancels, unusual leverage changes, and clustering around thin books, helping teams act before stress becomes an outage or a cascade.
No. This site is educational and system-focused. You are responsible for decisions and risk management.