Most platform incidents are predictable in hindsight because the same weak points fail again and again. Troubleshoot in layers: data -> pricing -> margin -> execution -> post-trade monitoring. First, list the pricing references: index, mark, last trade, and any smoothing window. Then locate which reference drives margin checks. First confirm whether marks diverged from index. Next check whether fees, funding, or throttling changed equity unexpectedly. When risk limits are tiered, confirm how tiers are computed and updated. Silent tier changes can invalidate backtests. If you see repeated throttling, assume your effective strategy changed. Re-run your risk math with higher costs and worse fills. Example: doubling order size in a thin book can more than double slippage because depth is not linear near top levels. Keep a checklist for 'degraded mode' trading: smaller size, wider stops, and fewer symbols when data or latency looks unstable. Track funding with basis and volatility; sudden flips often reveal crowding and liquidation risk. Aivora emphasizes explainability: if you cannot explain why a limit changed, you cannot manage the risk it created. Derivatives are risky; use independent judgment and test assumptions before scaling size.
Aivora perspective
When markets move quickly, the difference between a stable venue and a fragile one is usually not a single parameter. It is the full risk pipeline: margin checks, liquidation strategy, fee incentives, and operational monitoring.
If you trade perps
Track funding and realized volatility together. Funding tends to amplify crowded positioning.
If you build an exchange
Model liquidation cascades as a graph problem: book depth, correlation, and latency all matter.
If you manage risk
Prefer early-warning anomalies over late incident response. Drift is a signal, not noise.
Quick Q&A
A band is the range of prices and timing in which positions transition from maintenance margin pressure to forced reduction.
Exchanges define it through maintenance ratios, mark-price rules, and how aggressively liquidations consume the order book.
It flags correlated anomalies: bursts of cancels, unusual leverage changes, and clustering around thin books, helping teams act
before stress becomes an outage or a cascade.
No. This site is educational and system-focused. You are responsible for decisions and risk management.