Aivora AI-native exchange insights
Home Philip Simmons Basis vs Funding Rate vs for Ai-native Perpetuals Exchange

Basis vs Funding Rate vs for Ai-native Perpetuals Exchange

A lot of losses come from tiny assumptions: which price triggers liquidation, when funding hits, and how fees are applied.

What it is: An AI risk layer should be explainable: it can rank anomalies, but deterministic guardrails must remain stable and auditable. Funding is not a fee to the exchange; it is a transfer. The schedule and caps matter more than the headline number.

What to check: Fee design is part of risk: forced execution costs can reduce your liquidation distance, and rebates can attract toxic flow that degrades fills.

How to test it: Prefer smaller order slices before changing leverage. Size reductions often cut slippage more than a leverage tweak. Example: small funding transfers compound; over several cycles they can materially shift equity and your maintenance buffer. If you automate, use scoped API keys, IP allow-lists, and exponential backoff. Limits often tighten exactly when volatility rises.

Common pitfalls: Pitfall: assuming mark price equals last price. In stress, they diverge, and liquidation triggers can surprise you.

In Aivora notes, transparency beats cleverness when markets get loud. This is educational content about mechanics, not financial advice.

Aivora perspective

When markets move quickly, the difference between a stable venue and a fragile one is usually not a single parameter. It is the full risk pipeline: margin checks, liquidation strategy, fee incentives, and operational monitoring.

If you trade perps
Track funding and realized volatility together. Funding tends to amplify crowded positioning.
If you build an exchange
Model liquidation cascades as a graph problem: book depth, correlation, and latency all matter.
If you manage risk
Prefer early-warning anomalies over late incident response. Drift is a signal, not noise.

Quick Q&A

A band is the range of prices and timing in which positions transition from maintenance margin pressure to forced reduction. Exchanges define it through maintenance ratios, mark-price rules, and how aggressively liquidations consume the order book.
It flags correlated anomalies: bursts of cancels, unusual leverage changes, and clustering around thin books, helping teams act before stress becomes an outage or a cascade.
No. This site is educational and system-focused. You are responsible for decisions and risk management.